The Proctor Fallout isn’t Just about Karen Read

The Proctor Fallout isn’t Just about Karen Read. The dominoes were always going to fall; the structure was never built on a solid foundation.

What’s happening right now is a system-wide credibility collapse. Because once you prove bias + misconduct in one case, every case that officer touched becomes unstable in the eyes of the court.

This isn’t a conspiracy; this is case law. And the list is already long. As of two days ago, I’ve found the following cases connected to Proctor:

👉 Bianca Chionchio: Accessory after the fact (Randolph homicide).

👉 Brian Walshe: Accused of murdering and dismembering his wife, Ana (Anna) Walshe.

👉 Jovani De Los Santos (Jovani Delossantos): Charged in the deadly shooting of Ivanildo Cabral in Randolph.

👉 Julius Hammond-Desir & Samantha Schwartz: Related case noted (Scheduled for jury trial in October 2024/2025).

👉 Karen Read: Second-degree murder, Motor Vehicle Homicide, and Leaving the Scene of an Accident in the death of John O’Keefe.

👉 Lance Holloman: Charged with a homicide on I-93 (2017).

👉 Myles King: Accused of fatally shooting Marquis Simmons in Milton (July 2021).

👉 Ingolf Tuerk, Prominent Dover Doctor: Accused of killing his wife.

👉 Shawn Johnson: Faces Murder charges for a deadly shooting outside a Randolph country club (July 4, 2023).

👉 Commonwealth v. Aidan Timothy Kearney (aka “Turtleboy”): Multiple counts of Felony Witness Intimidation, harassment, and violating a restraining order.

👉 Corri Hopkins v. Norfolk County DA’s Office: Civil action seeking compliance with Public Records Laws.

👉 Elizabeth Proctor: Civil Lawsuit Defendant (in Karen Read’s civil case).

👉 Kelly Dever (BPD Officer): Administrative/Investigation (Associated with FBI document release).

👉 Richard Schiffer (Owner of Canton Fence): Felony Witness Intimidation, harassment, littering.

👉 Defense teams demanding discovery.

👉 Judges are being compelled to acknowledge their biases.

This is not one trial. This is a structural integrity breach. And everyone in the system is aware of it.

This is what happens when one crack exposes the foundation.

The data dump from Proctor’s phone and cloud accounts didn’t just affect the Read case.

It triggered a required review across multiple homicide cases, aggravated assaults, and witness intimidation trials where his judgment, language, or evidence handling could be questioned.

The spreadsheet I’ve built from court filings, Brady letters, defense motions, and the federal protective order shows the pattern clearly:

When the lead investigator is compromised, the state’s credibility collapses right behind him. And the system is now scrambling to contain the leak.

You can see the research here.

There’s a line between human error and systemic protection.

This episode shows what happens when that line disappears.

We start with a case where grief was performed, not felt; where the emotional response at a funeral felt rehearsed, hollow, and convenient.

Then we move into something much heavier; how personal loyalty, narrative control, and selective blindness can warp the pursuit of truth inside law enforcement.

What happens when the lead investigator has personal ties to the people he’s supposed to be investigating?

What happens when digital evidence contradicts the official story?

What happens when video goes missing, timelines don’t match, and interviews are delayed until federal pressure arrives?

Patterns don’t lie.

Data doesn’t lie.

Silence is its own language.

---

This episode traces how deception moves from the personal level to the institutional level; how a single compromised decision can expand into a full systemic pattern of silence, narrative control, and coordinated protection.

We begin with the Chad Daybell case. The focus isn’t the crime itself, but the performance of grief.

At Tammy Daybell’s funeral, his behavior was detached, rehearsed, and emotionally hollow; he cried only when someone else cried, and used the funeral space to demean her memory. It is a clear example of manipulation masking itself as composure.

The takeaway: when truth threatens the story, performance replaces authenticity.

Then the episode shifts into the Karen Read / John O’Keefe case, where that same pattern appears on a larger scale.

The core issue:

Lead investigator Michael Proctor had long-standing personal ties to the Albert family, whose home is central to the events of that night.

He never disclosed these ties. Instead, we see text messages showing immediate bias, hostility, and a predetermined conclusion of guilt.

Investigative choices consistently favored one controlled narrative.

Key contradictions highlighted:

• Jennifer McCabe’s Google search: “how long to die in the cold” around 2:27 a.m. — hours before the body was said to be found.

• Apple Health data showing O’Keefe’s phone registering movement inside the Albert house, contradicting the state’s claim that he was never inside.

• 42 missing minutes of sallyport footage during vehicle processing.

• Delayed and selective interviews, especially regarding individuals present in the house.

This is not the failure of a single investigator; it is a network effect. Loyalty outranked truth. Proximity outranked procedure. Narrative outranked evidence.

To show this isn’t new, the episode brings in the historical case of Officer Michael Cox (1995):

Mistaken for a suspect, beaten unconscious by fellow officers.

The immediate response was a coordinated cover story: “he slipped on ice.”

Officers were instructed not to file reports; silence was enforced.

Only after years of legal battle did Cox force accountability.

The parallel is unmistakable:

When institutional loyalty is prioritized over integrity, truth becomes optional. When truth becomes optional, justice collapses.

And when justice collapses, no citizen is protected.

The episode ends with a call to vigilance:

Let the data speak.

Question narratives that arrive pre-packaged.

Recognize patterns, not isolated events.

This is not about distrust; it is about sovereignty.

It is about aligning perception with reality rather than performance.

Truth does not tremble. Truth does not hide. Truth does not require silence agreements.

We bring it into the light and let it breathe.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zirdntEvfHU